History is often shaped by decisive actions and pivotal moments; however, lurking behind many significant near events outcomes are "near misses" – instances where a slight variation in circumstances could have led to drastically different historical narratives. These moments remind us of the fragile nature of events that have defined humanity.

One of the most notable near misses occurred during World War II with the failed assassination of Adolf Hitler. On July 20, 1944, a bomb planted by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg was detonated at the Führer’s Wolf’s Lair in East Prussia. The explosion killed four people but left Hitler unharmed. Had he been killed, the immediate ramifications on the Nazi regime might have led to negotiations and an earlier end to the war in Europe. A different leadership could have altered the post-war landscape as well, potentially preventing the division of Germany and the onset of the Cold War.

Another critical near miss took place during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. The world stood on the edge of nuclear war as the United States discovered Soviet missile installations in Cuba. A miscommunication could have easily escalated into a full-scale conflict. At one point, a Soviet submarine, unaware of the non-declared war status, was targeted by American ships. The submarine commander considered launching a nuclear torpedo in response. The fate of civilization was precariously balanced, and had he done so, the repercussions could have resulted in immediate retaliation from the U.S., drastically altering global history.

The failed assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 is another profound near miss. His murder is often cited as the spark that ignited World War I. However, the day of the assassination, an initial attack of bomb throwers failed to kill Ferdinand, who subsequently escaped unharmed. It was later, purely by chance, that he crossed paths with his eventual assassins. Had he not happened upon them, it is conceivable that the assassination—and thus the war—could have been avoided, potentially preventing the complex web of alliances that drew numerous nations into conflict, thereby reshaping the geopolitical landscape of the 20th century.

In the realm of science and technology, one of the biggest near misses involved the invention of the computer. In the 1930s, a handful of inventors, including Alan Turing and John Atanasoff, were on the cusp of creating electronic computing machines. If funding and support had come earlier for Turing’s ideas or if Atanasoff’s work had gained wider recognition, the digital revolution might have experienced an earlier and different timeline. The global economy, society, and everyday life might not resemble their current forms had computing technology developed decades earlier.

Lastly, the Y2K scare at the turn of the millennium is a compelling example of how societal fear of a potential disaster can be seen through the lens of a near miss. The concerns over computer systems failing due to the year change prompted massive overhauls and precautionary measures. The resultant smooth transition was hailed as a success of prevention; however, in hindsight, it demonstrated how perception shapes our understanding of risk and consequence.

These near misses illustrate the paths not taken and the fragility of historical events. Each incident highlights the profound understanding that history is often determined by a series of fortunate and unfortunate coincidences, inviting reflection on the countless alternate realities that might have unfolded.